Monday, March 14, 2022

Cut Out of the Same Cloth

Do the administrators of We Never Forget and Mad About the Boy know David Bret hides behind all those million and one aliases on their groups? I contend they certainly do. I have documentation, which I have posted previously on this blog, that Tracy Terhune was passing information to Bret for his use on his killing blogs... as far back as 2010. And at that time, Terhune was asking Bret not to reveal he was the source of the information.

In 2019, Cindy Martin said all the defamation Bret writes about us for Tracy Terhune to post on his designated hit blog he runs against us, has to first be read and approved of by Terhune. So Terhune thinks Bret's disgusting and death-laden lies about us are acceptable? Apparently so. David Bret, David Spurr, Edel Man, Edel anything, Etienne, Nicole, Joey, Mrs. Trellis, Albert Bastista Morris and etc., are all the same person and I will add Tracy Terhune, in his endless complicity, to that list as being the same person as Bret.

Terhune hid any affiliation with Bret for years, even swearing on an affidavit that before 2010 he'd never heard of Bret. Fat chance of that. But a few years ago, Terhune and Bret became good buddies as Bret refers to it. “It” being their coalition from hell, their death-laden mocking of our ages, the “tick-tocking” by Terhune and his gloating that no one will “miss us when we are gone,” etc. etc,

So Terhune and Bret, what is the expression I am looking for... are “cut out of the same cloth”? It is frightening to me that the coalition of Terhune and Bret can create such a situation on those two groups for people innocent of who they really are. There is a reason readers of this blog post as “Anonymous”. A serious reason. Terhune allows Bret run about masked on his two groups at the risk of unsuspecting people. I think Eleanor Gribbin posting warnings about how Bret is not allowed on the group is completely fake. Just to let people know they would never allow such a fiend to be present. He always is and they know it. What is wrong with that? A lot actually.

Mad About the Boy and We Never Forget are “Bret-infested” and the administrators are perfectly aware, imo. Not minutes after I posted my previous post about Valentino and the piano, David Bret tweeted the following. (see below) Sad, isn't it? Not sad because his attempt to be witty failed so miserably. I guess the skeleton is obviously me. Zzzzzzzz. (How many death references about me can that man make in one lifetime?)

But sad... because this crap is tacitly approved of by Tracy Terhune and that should demean anyone's opinion of both men in a big way. And as a reader suggested to me I should probably say the following to Death Bret, “Thanks for making me the center of your world.” Wow. 

But I want him to realize,  I am in great health and will not become a skeleton for while. And even if I did, so what? Is there something wrong with that? But I do not find death hilarious and his years of death images do not frighten me, nor intimidate me. His cartoons and skeletons are stupid, boring in their predictability and are more testimony of a sick, sad mind. 



27 comments:

  1. Bret is such a gruesome little hobgoblin. Along with the puerile tweet Ms. Floris posted above, Bret also alludes to Valentino in Moran of the Lady Letty as a campy gay male, makes fun of the late Fr Michael Morris, and promotes Dark Lover and Terhune's book. Bret also shills a book by Albert Batista Morris, his own alias! Talk about cuckoo! How he must laugh at Gribbin and her minions as they praise and flatter Batista Bret.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perfect description of the "Studies Community"..."Cuckoo!"

      Delete
  2. Gribbin knows exactly what is going on with Bret and that her fan site is "Bret infested". She knows that Terhune gives Bret a pass. She also knows that if she crosses Terhune, he will make her persona non grata in the "Studies Community" as he has to others before. Gribbin's warped sense of self-identity is so tied up with publicly ogling old photos of Valentino's body that she's afraid she'll lose her position as "head ogler".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gribbin is only a stand-in for Terhune as "head ogler". Terhune lives vicariously through her posting the most evocative photos of Valentino to be found.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The comment at 2:01 is very insightful. Terhune, Constable and other males like them self censor and restrain themselves, for the most part, from joining in the desperate comments about Valentino’s face and body. There is apparently a real hesitance to revel in their patently obvious homoerotic longings for Valentino. Why should this be the case in 2022? The reasons for this are known only to them. But it is clear that the Golden Girls serve a vital stand in function. That is why Terhune and Constable tolerate, but despise them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is truth to this. Gribbin, O'Bannon, Santiago, Mounts and all of the other "ladies of a certain age" on MAtB & WNF are like schoolgirls who have a crush on "Our Boy". They supply publicly the cringeworthy & adolescent discussion that Terhune, Constable, etc. etc. would like to be involved with but hold back from.
      And yes, the ladies are certainly deeply despised for that perceived freedom by those gentlemen admirers.

      Delete
    2. Sorry but I am a little confused about the above comment though maybe I know what it means, I am a supporter of the Floris, understanding that Constable , Turdhune and other gay members still insist on Rudy being gay.

      Delete
    3. Although I do not doubt what is going on there.Three ringed circus is what it sounds like.

      Delete
    4. Yes. They should change the name of Mad About the Boy to, "Under the Big Top"!

      Delete
  5. Terhune sitting on top of the pyramid must be painful on that pointy thing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Where Terhune is the top clown , the gay members can get their own website where they can poo and ahh over Rudy s body. And where Bret is welcomed with his slither remarks.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In all seriousness, it is a shame that male admirers of Valentino who happen to be gay cannot engage in a serious dialogue about his legacy from a queer perspective (very different than saying Valentino was gay).
    Instead, we have a male cast characters who guard against revealing any hint of their attraction to Rudy (which is obvious to everyone else). Sometimes an initial attraction to someone like Valentino can lead to learning more in a serious way about his life and legacy. Instead, these men live vicariously on Facebook through the attractions that older women share about Valentino. It never seems to go deeper than that.
    Besides a lack of intellectual curiosity, these men also seem to channel their frustrated energies into a sense of "ownership" of Valentino and his truth. Except they want to bend that truth to fit their own narrative. In an extreme case, no amount of sublimation through the hoarding of an idol's relics will ever make that idol one's lover come back from the dead.
    In many ways, they are to be pitied in their immaturity and frustrations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You make good points. I never thought any of it had much to do with sexuality, but instead just control of an absolutely false narrative. It is a strategy to call anyone who questions them on anything, “homophobic”. I honestly do not think they care either way or at all about Valentino or actual history.

      Delete
    2. It will also never change the truth about what Valentino was, a man who loved women.

      Delete
  8. As long as degrading cruelty with heartless attitudes and words are not directed at them and to someone else, “lesser devils” don’t care.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, I think it has everything to do with sexuality, specifically of the unfulfilled and frustrated variety. It’s about little else really. The hoarding by the collectors and the sharing of embarrassing fantasies about Valentino on the forums are both substitutes for gratifying sex lives with living, breathing human beings.

      Delete
  9. ...."There is a reason readers of this blog post as “Anonymous”. A serious reason."
    This is very much the truth.

    I belong to Facebook and have membership in both WNF & MAtB. I have rarely posted in either of them and have not done so at all in the last couple of years. I was hurt badly once when I introduced a topic on Valentino that quickly turned from what I hoped would be a "discussion" to an "attack" on me because the 'regulars' did not agree with what I was trying to say. I learned my lesson that intelligent discussion and difference of perspective has no place on either Terhune controlled Facebook page and that the party line that he approves is the only thing that will be tolerated.
    Also, make no mistake, those kindly appearing Golden Girls are ruthless as they will do anything to protect their own perceived status in the Terhune regime.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Very sad indeed, 4:54 p.m. -
    On Facebook, I use my real name because I belong to several other discussion forums and also use the account to keep in touch with old friends. Never any problems EXCEPT on the Terhune puppet forums where I have had nasty messages from some of the big shots who regularly post there. Some of these have been Bret under various aliases.
    Sadly, I do not dare use my name here on this blog in postings because I know that Terhune and his minions are watching and would quickly use anything I say here as weapons against me. I have no doubt they would publicly shame me on their Facebook pages. It's a real shame that a Valentino enthusiast cannot feel free to cross platforms and be engaged in various forums in discussion about him.
    This way of operating though hatred and slander that Terhune, Hill, Constable, Gribbin, O'Bannon, Bret et al have has been shown to be true time and time again. Any prudent person would watch their back with these horrible people constantly around and seeking victims who stray from their twisted agenda.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Watch your back" indeed. They prey on people as years of the evidence we have collected proves.

      Delete
    2. "Terhune puppet forums". Well said. 👍👍👍

      Delete
  11. "Watch your back " is definitely the right word in this case. If they could find out who the anonymous commenters are, they would go after them without hesitation. Such as the young blogger from Sweden just for giving Evelyn and Renato s good reviews. Sick!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Think someone from England suggested that Renato write The True Rudolph Valentino anonymously because of Bret, Terhune and Martin.If you use your real name it means danger. My opinion of course, but then Evelyn and Renato are in hiding because of that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "They" mock us for saying we live in hiding. But if someone was writing obsessively about your death for 12 years, and trolling your every move, I think any reasonable person would do the same. Apart from what they hand out, they inspire hatred towards us and that is unsettling to say the least.

      Delete
  13. Absolutely,they are in my opinion unstable people in order to do that. Feel terrible that you two are going thru this. But by inciting that towards you , that only shows what kind of persons that they are.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Constable has a low opinion of Valentino that i find surprising Seem to remember that he was eager to prove that Rudy was gay.

    ReplyDelete