Sunday, January 31, 2021

My Sweet Shadow

                                         

 

Home Sweet Crematorium?

* The sentiments expressed in this blog post are my opinion based on my decade of documented nightmarish experience and screenshots as proof of my statements will be forwarded to anyone upon request.* 

Yesterday someone contacted me to ask if I thought an “Albert Batista Morris” was David Bret. I answered yes and I did some research in an effort to support my answer about this very present commentator on those Facebook groups: Mad About the Boy and We Never ForgetI do know David Bret can no longer appear under his own name on those groups or seems members up and run for the exits.

On Mad About the Boy, administrator Eleanor Gribbin, (who has called my books the “ravings of a mad woman” and forbids even the mention of my name) openly engaged in a fierce disparagement of David Bret and issued his banishment from the group with members chiming in with disgust and hatred for him and his books. Despite a banner reading, "Anything written by David Brett (sic), is not welcome in this group, Thank-you, Eleanor” and her engaging with members in calling him “vicious, “a trouble maker”, “disgusting”, etc.“, Albert Morris is still there and everywhere on Mad About the Boy and We Never Forget. I understand people use aliases online, for personal safety reasons and it is legal. But I feel in the case of Albert Batista Morris, it is something to warn people about for two reasons: one... who he really is and what he has and still does to people and two... those administrators of those two groups know he is David Bret and are deceiving their membership 100%.

Why should David Bret not be on those sites? Ask them. Terhune allows him to openly trash us on that blog he runs under the title of my book (in violation of a court order), but on his two main Valentino Facebook groups, Bret has been banished. Or has he? I say not at all. To expose this utter hypocrisy and deception...I cite the following:

A cursory review of Albert Morris' Facebook page tells us many things he wants us to believe about this character.. He claims he as “author”, was born in 1957 to a Cuban mother and an American father and says he lives in Miami, Florida. The account was opened in June of 2011.

It seemed out of the ordinary that this page with no personal information other than “author” would have some 2400 friends and hundreds of followers. The friends list was obviously purchased because there was no geographical or familial commonality; it was as random as can be. One can easily buy Facebook friends on many sites (which I will not link to here because I think many are corrupt) such as“Genuinelikes”. (Just Google, “Buy Facebook Friends and Followers to find them).

This said those sites, eager to sell you an impressive list of a fast thousand of Facebook friends will not customize it and in Albert Batista Morris' list we find a wild disparity from a sales person at a waffle house, to horse trainers in Punjab, public high schools in Paris and Flint, Michigan, the Mayo Clinic, Subway sandwich makers and someone named Satvindwe Singh, who lists his occupation as “studying at student.” But lo and behold, as I scrolled through, I saw one name which stood out, “Eleanor Gribbin”. Wait a minute I thought, this is the same person who recently banned Bret from her group. And yes, predictably Albert Morris recommends Bret's books and lists them as his “favorites”.

As we had Albert's date of birth and full name, we searched for any records on file on Ancestry and found nothing. There were many Albert Morris entries, but none with the middle name of “Batista” and none with this name born in 1957. He does not exist. A White Pages directory search revealed the closest “Albert Morris” lived 606 miles from Miami, Florida in Savannah, Georgia and is 75 years old. And Albert Batista's claim of “dual citizenship” is false as no documentation on this is filed in online immigration archives.

Knowing Bret is wont to hack into dead people's Facebook pages and I cite Cindy Martin writing Renato on May 29, 2019 and excerpted from an exchange that day,

...I imagine that young man whose images appear on the Albert Morris page could very well have passed away years ago.

As Morris claims to be an “author”, my next stop was his Amazon book listed for sale titled, “The Fabulous Million Dollar Sand Bar”. The book's blurb reveals Bret's common themes of “show biz glamour”, “cafe society” and the story of a boy who, “dreams of being a writer and escaping the step-dad who persecutes him for being different.” (Bret's own story?)

Here we also read the fantastic bio he posted which tells us of his blood relation to the Cuban dictator along with a five star review written by a “William Bostock” who also does not exist (except for a Senior Commander in the Royal Australian Air Force who died in 1968 ). The writing of the mile long review includes such high praise as,

...“ breathtaking in its psychological acuity”, “... the Miami setting is evocatively rendered and heightens the novels power”, “ the novel is stylistically complex in its symbolism”, a “spellbinding fable”, “the sentences sparkle like cut and polished diamonds” and the “lyricism of the prose is ethereal”. So there is all of that.

This was pretty much it for Albert Batista Morris' presence online as an “author”, except for a mention of his website @https://www.albertbatistamorris.com/ . I found this is a Wix hosted site, a format I use for my websites. But other than posting his name on the Homepage and contact page, Albert did not understand that to customize the site you have to build each page with your own items for sale and information. The generic template remains untouched with blank spaces as suggestions, such as, “I'm a product” and ads for lipstick and fictional stories written by generic authors used only as samples.

Wix hosted websites are not cheap and cost 125$ a year to run without ads. Since Albert's website has no ads, he is paying for that service while telling a court he has zero dollars to pay us a penny on those tens of thousands of Euros of damages awarded to us by the Court of Asti.

The contact info on that website states Albert Batista Morris' address as: 4058 NE 7th Ave., Oakland Park, Florida. A Google maps street level search of this address revealed this as an alley/string of storage units and 4058 as the address of the Brooks Cremation and Funeral Service. Here is Albert Batista Morris' home, sweet home, in Miami:


Now of course I knew before I even set off on this little trip into the actual reality of one Albert Morris that this was David Bret. This because on May 29, 2019, his friend, co-hort, phone buddy and confidant Cindy Martin wrote Renato and I excerpt:


I guess we can now add this fake relationship to Batista, “Fulgencio Batista y Zaldivar”, the iconic Cuban dictator...to Bret's ever-growing list of fake (imaginary) famous relations, friends and sources. In my expert opinion I firmly believe he has no relationship, as he claims... to Andre Daven, was never in contact with Daven's wife, never received a stack of Daven's letters, never met Greta Garbo, never spoke a word to Marlene Dietrich (if he had those tapes he would be playing them everywhere), owns no Valentino diaries, never knew Chaw Mank (who died years before Bret wrote a word on Valentino)... and never knew all those famous porn stars he claims so proudly he hobnobbed with whose names I have fortunately forgotten. I think you see what I am saying... and the list is long and getting longer. 

I find it the height of hypocrisy that Eleanor Gribbin, Simon Constable, Tracy Terhune, etc. would claim public disassociation with David Bret to their Facebook group members, yet knowingly permit him as Albert Morris to participate in those discussions with people who would not be there if they knew who they were talking to. Perhaps it does not merit explaining why to most people... but...

This man, David Bret, as Cindy Martin said, “masquerading as Albert Morris”, has now spent over a decade writing about my death, our deaths, sharing his “witty death wishes” for us (in gory and violent detail) and reveling in his brutal countdowns to our deaths.

This is a man who lied about me to the world in a million different ways... claiming I have a drug and criminal history, that I use cocaine (calling me cokehead and saying I have arrest warrants out on me), calling me homophobic a million and one times ("the only good homophobe is a dead one"), mocked and terrorized me and mine with images of corpses and death and claimed of all things that I stalk him and called him a rapist. None of this happened or does happen. And news flash for him... no one on earth would stalk the likes of him. Horrifying thought.

After my experience with this man and victorious lawsuit, (see https://www.zumayawinslawsuit.com/ ) I think he should not be allowed to come within a mile of a computer, let alone meander on those groups with well-meaning and unknowing folks. And according to Cindy Martin, those unknowing folks do not include her, nor Tracy Terhune, Simon Constable, Eleanor Gribbin, etc.

It is for this reason I share this bit of information on Albert Batista Morris... which in my opinion Bret coined from a grab of Valentino's brother's name and Michael Morris, who was very present against Bret in the summer of 2011 when the account was created. I honestly think the account was originally “Alberto Morris”.

I say buyer beware; Albert Batista Morris who claims to reside at the Brooks Cremation and Funeral Services...is David Bret.

* The sentiments expressed in this blog post are my opinion based on my decade of documented nightmarish experience and screenshots as proof of my statements will be forwarded to anyone upon request. 

Saturday, January 30, 2021

Some Unfinished Business

I continue to await Cindy Martin's public retraction of her telling people Michael Morris did not write his fine addendum to Madam Valentino and that I took advantage of his death. Imagine my reaction when I saw someone ask her about Michael's new book and she told them, “There is no new book out by Michael Morris.” Even during her brief escape from those miserable haters...she did not state publicly she lied about Beyond Valentino and did so to deter sales and respect for Michael Morris' posthumous book. I believe this retraction should be forthcoming, sincere and apologetic. This is long overdue. 

Within a few weeks of sending me this e-mail, (below) Michael Morris would pass away. We thought we had much more time to complete our work on Beyond Valentino. I completed the book according to his outline, with his writings, his images and through his amazing contacts who were all stricken with news of his passing and eager to help me in any possible way.




 Le Grand St. Michel by Rafaello Sanzio


Thursday, January 28, 2021

"The Sheik of El Jadida"

Some of my sketches from our Moroccan home. "The Sheik of El Jadida", #renato,  makes it fun and comfortable but, sorry Morocco... not my favorite place at all. That country has issues. 

 

Catch Lines

In a recent post, I cited Baltasar Cué's passage from The True Rudolph Valentino where he explains how reviews and advertisements were dispersed by a film's producers. He explains how reviews for a movie were written long before the movie was shown. In this piece (below) which appeared in the Exhibitor's Herald (a trade publication), F. B.O. (Film Booking Offices of America) instructs prospective theaters how to promote their film, When Love Grows Cold, starring Natacha Rambova.

She was furious over the change in title and F.B.O.'s usage of her name as “Mrs. Rudolph Valentino” and this ad, designed to exploit her divorce at the time, stands as proof of their intentions. Much more about this film in Astral Affairs Rambova.

I guess it was as easy as filling in the blanks and making sure to include those “Catch Lines”.



Wednesday, January 27, 2021

Rudolph Valentino, The Vamp & More

In My Opinion

Throughout 2003, I interviewed Bob and Bunny Ullman and collector Bill Self. Bob Ullman was adamant I not write a word about his father's tenure as Valentino's executor without those probate court records in hand as proof of his father's performance. Bill Self knew I was looking for those records and knew they were missing from their rightful location in the Los Angeles County Hall of Records. As I interviewed, traveling back and forth between the Ullmans and Self, it was a delicate dance to find those missing records.

I have written many times how those missing records were tracked from collector to collector and how the Valentino family exchanged one of Valentino's shirts for the entire file. This was all confirmed by Tracy Terhune, Donna Hill, Bill Self and explained again recently by Cindy Martin.

The tragedy in this situation is that so many aspects of George Ullman's true, and stellar, performance as executor were hidden from public review. The further tragedy is that many aspects of Valentino's life and business were, and still are, also hidden from public review.

I did recover some one thousand pages of the file as official court copies but the entire file is still hidden away by the Valentino family and any collector who might have made copies. Again I ask, “Why hide them if there is nothing to hide?” Pretty obvious to me what is going on.

One of the most fascinating aspects I discovered in that file of copies was the story of Cosmic Arts, Inc. Some of this history was told through the book keeping records, some through the extracts of the court-ordered audit conducted and some through the direct testimony. (Below) I share a bit of George Ullman's testimony relating to the establishment of Cosmic Arts, Inc.... Valentino's first corporate alter ego.

I am 100% sure there is still a wealth of unknown information hidden away in the hoards of collectors and the Valentino family. In my opinion, this does no one any service and is a total shame.




Monday, January 25, 2021

Regarding the "falsity of his reports..."

A well-written comment (below) on the nature of the defamation against me by David Bret; this written by the judge who handed down my victorious verdict. This is one page of the public records on file and this particular document is taken from the verdict. David Bret lost the lawsuit I brought against him because he chose to claim it was fake and that he had not been served. Of course just as most everything Bret has ever said about me... this was all false. He was served and all protocol in Italy and in Great Britain was followed to the letter of the law.

Instead of responding to the lawsuit, he opened various websites and blogs claiming it was a non-existent case. Now that he faces a collection process for the damages awarded to me, he knows better. 

I paid a very high price for challenging Bret and for saying I considered his grand design in making Valentino gay nothing but a hoax based on fake sources. I still believe this and believe strongly that no one should force a false sexual identity on anyone for any reason. 

The entire verdict, the case as filed in the Court of Asti and the evidence our lawyers submitted may be viewed at www.zumayawinslawsuit.com

While Bret continues to post against Renato and me... as hosted by Tracy Ryan Terhune, I will be posting more of the verdict here as proof it was a very real case which I won. 


 

Saturday, January 23, 2021

Smashing Myths

During the few days the first edition of Affairs Valentino was on Amazon in the spring of 2011, some copies sold and I would eventually receive a few welcome and good reviews. I excerpted two of the more notable reviews on the back of Affairs Valentino - Special Edition.

Those who spent the entire year previous to my publishing the book for the first time attacking me in the worst possible way online, swarmed the book with disgusting reviews. This was all a continuation of their hellish posts hurled my way throughout 2010..and those reviews had no relevance to the book's content, i.e. claiming the book fell apart, that there was “homophobia dripping from every page”, that it was “trash fiction”. If it was not that specific slurry of insult driving any readers away, it was a scouring for typos and mocking of all missteps of which there were many at that point.

It was kind of like having a gang mob you and break your legs so badly you could not walk and then those same people mocked you for not being able to dance. I have written about that time and spoken about it; I hoped in publishing the book I would put the nightmare of their daily abuse behind me. I thought I would just put the book in print, sell a few copies and have the wicked filth they were posting online about me and mine every single day on many terrifying sites cease. How wrong I was. 

With my reputation in tatters, shredded by Terhune and Bret... anyone Googling my name by the end of 2010 would find such lies as my having a long history of drug abuse, fake accounts how people from all corners of the world hated me, that I was a liar, a cheat and a fraud who was wanted by the law, etc. So when the book came out they continued with this bullying in attacking the book. They are still at it with Terhune continuing to pretend he runs a “literary critique” under my book's title when every single person in the world who knows about this story... realizes this was never and is not his intent there.

Those same people attacking me, mocked my citing the good reviews I received but those reviews were intelligent, thoughtful and I am proud of them and always will be. I recently found the review by Tony Bonn, the editor of The American Chronicle and excerpt his much longer review here. (see below)




Friday, January 22, 2021

At the Orpheum

I stand in front of the Orpheum LA (below) and Natacha Rambova appears long ago with Theodore Kosloff in their infamous Aztec Dance at an Orpheum Circuit theater. The Orpheum Circuit has an interesting history:

@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orpheum_Circuit




Thursday, January 21, 2021

Zero Tolerance - An Overview

In light of recent and unfortunate Facebook group activity, I clarify the difference between Renato blocking from his group and Tracy Ryan Terhune's blocking, specifically of us and for years. We have been blocked on both of the groups he runs, We Never Forget and Mad About the Boy and without being members for a single moment. Our being blocked is his manner of censorship of our work and a key component of his continued strategy to ruin us and bury our work. This statement is supported by an enormous body of evidence. 

So for the accounts Renato blocked, known as “Mason, Ramos and Sa”, I share a bit of a recap FYI as explanation of our zero tolerance policy about people who think it OK to be active supporters on his groups and also ours. That is not possible and here is why.

For years we have be informed via screenshots which were captured from exchanges on his groups. Whenever our work is mentioned, we are insulted, defamed, the work dismissed as “fabrication”, “trash fiction”, the “ravings of a madwoman”, etc. and threads mentioning us and our work are deleted immediately. As Simon Constable recently reminded the group's followers that the mere mention of my name was "against the rules."

We have been informed by Cindy Martin, one of Terhune's most eager followers that he has worked for years not only organizing but running what she confirmed as the “Campaign to Ruin Evelyn”. He has been open about this effort and no where is this more apparent than on the blog he has run since 2012, under the title of my Valentino biography, Affairs Valentino where he files his hateful diatribes against us and brags about diverting my legitimate web traffic.

He has run this designated hate blog, which over the years has seen many incarnations, all horribly cruel, by posting images of everything from pigs, toilets, Satan, Bibles and endless mocking images and posts about my being insane, a “madwoman”... well it goes on ad infinitum. (below a sampling of his home page images he has used on this now fake “literary critique” he runs under my book's title.)


I add that the blog was mine for years. I closed it in 2011 when David Bret threatened to open blogs about my family members. I could have made it not-public but panicked and hoped this would protect my family. It was then Terhune seized the opportunity in his most cruel way. 

Currently, he uses the blog also as a platform for David Bret to post his lies and insults about us and our work. David Bret is under a court order not to post about us online as he lost the defamation lawsuit I filed against him in Italy in 2016. While he has yet to pay one single dollar of the court ordered damages, Terhune is complicit in Bret's violating the verdict handed down in the case.

You may read the case as filed, the verdict and the evidence as filed here : www.zumayawinslawsuit.com

While Tracy Ryan Terhune feigns his role as an expert and the “Leader”, behind his scenes he permits Bret to comment on that hate blog in violation of a court order. Yet he does not link his posts on that hate blog to his Facebook groups and does not promote his angry and cruel posts about us.

Terhune's rhetoric reaches the height of the very definition of bullying. He calls my husband names, mocked a photo in which Renato is wearing a Moroccan robe as “the man who wears dresses”.. and engaged in an ageist and mocking “tick tock” countdown to our deaths; to mention just a few from the years of his tremendous insults targeting us on that blog.

With this scant over view of Terhune's public actions against us, it should be obvious to any rational person why we are zero tolerance about entertaining anyone who is active on his groups.

We have standards which include not being affiliated with the cronies and supporters of a person who openly bullies us. Perhaps these people who participate in his groups, do not realize the gravity and longevity of his campaign to ruin us and act hoping to “please the leader” .

I reject his role as leader of anything in the Valentino world and in my opinion he only holds that position because he bought a lot of things which once belonged to Valentino. Without that collection, in my opinion he would merit far less respect because his claims to be an expert on Valentino are repeatedly proven to be wrong.

It is no secret now Terhune partners with Bret and they have been working together for many years with Terhune initially instructing Bret to hide his involvement. (see document he submitted to the court in Burbank which is on file as public record)


Meanwhile Cindy Martin wrote to Renato on June 2, 2019, “Tracy has such power over people because if (sic) that yearly memorial he just has to crook his little finger and they all come running.” (see image below) Screenshot excerpts taken from:


And despite his partner in bullying us not appearing under his name David Bret in either of Terhune's groups, Terhune still allows Bret's known alias, “Albert Morris” to be an active participant in his groups.

We block people who are actively affiliated with Terhune's machinations and active on his groups because of the danger he presents and has presented to us. This especially is true in regards to his partnership with David Bret... who in an e-mail (preserved on my e-mail server) to me once wrote which I share as illustration:


And:

So you can clearly see this is no small issue and for us it presents a clear danger. Terhune blocks in his groups to censor information, new discoveries and to silence voices of dissent. It is a world of difference.

What kind of people would we be... if we allowed this man or those affiliated with him to infect our space further in any way? Bullying such as he openly participates in, should not be tolerated in 2021 and I believe anyone would do the same if they were in our position. I point out to Mason, Ramos and Sa, that Terhune's motives are not such a secret and his anti-Affairs Valentino propaganda and censorship has long ago been fully exposed. Yet, I would imagine for your service as of late, you will be able now to try on Rudy's ring come next August.

But not on your life can you hop, skip and jump between the man who actively bullies us mercilessly every day on that blog and us... by using some excuse you “just want to learn about Rudy.” We are not that stupid. Zero tolerance is our rule. 

Wednesday, January 20, 2021

An Endless Credit to Him

In our podcast, Rudolph Valentino, That Left Eye & More, we pointed out the problem with Valentino's left eye. According to the doctors who made the diagnosis in the Royal Italian Embassy in Los Angeles, he was blind in his left eye.

I think once you are aware of that, it becomes noticeable. In the images below I think we see the left eye out of sync with the right eye and it is an endless credit to him that he so successfully masked this situation.

The pupils should be focused in the same direction which is not the case in reality. 

Hear the podcast here: youtube.com/watch?v=5QBbiUFWaoI

Such a Success!

I am so happy to see the podcast we made on Valentino's left eye is such a success. I feel it is important research to discuss and hope to pursue this further in the future. 


 Watch the episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QBbiUFWaoI

Tuesday, January 19, 2021

Regarding that 17th Century Ancestor

In Cindy Martin's “confirmation” that she is a 4th cousin of Natacha Rambova, which she posted on Tracy Terhune's Facebook group, We Never Forget, she invites readers to join Ancestry.com and check out her lineage with this caveat:

“...I warn you though, its an arduous task.”

I did check it out with a genealogist who took a look at it for me after I forwarded them the two page document and explanation Martin posted. Because they shared their assessment with me I will do the same here.

If Martin was a fourth cousin of Natacha and nothing more, simply stated as she did... this would have been straight forward. This is not the case, see the top of her ancestry.com document:

...where it states clearly that the relationship between Natacha and Cindy Martin's son is “5th cousin 3x removed of husband of 1st cousin 6x removed”.

To put it simply, a “fourth cousin” is not the same as a, “4th cousin 3x removed of husband of 1st cousin 6x removed”.

Removed” means going back a generation, meaning she shares what could be mathematically 900-1500 (or more) possible cousins from many generations ago and these cousins are only related to a “husband's” lineage six generations ago (i.e. someone married into her family).

In regards to the subject of that “husband” as was pointed out to me, on page two of her document we find:

So according to her own document, Martin alleges her connection through the Meeks family and in this she shares no bloodline or DNA with Rambova. This is made clear when it is explained she is not a fourth cousin but a “fourth cousin, 3 times removed of a husband's first cousin six times removed”. The connection with the Kimball family is made by the marriage of Sarah Jane Meeks (1841-1920) and Henry Kimball (1833-1862).

“Husband”, Henry Kimball's common relative with Rambova is 6 x removed, or six generations removed... which is a long, long time ago. The genealogist easily found the common relative shared by Natacha and Henry Kimball: an early 17th century Kimball living in England (see page one of the ancestry.com document, Richard Kimball (1595-1697).

In her summary, Martin mentions that she is connected to Natacha via a “Priddy Meeks” who does not appear on her document. The document only reflects an extremely remote connection and this by marriage to the Kimball family. Indeed there are many Priddy Meeks in ancestry.com and it is impossible to verify which one Martin refers to as she does not include the dates or other identifying information. If the Meeks family is her connection, there is no way to verify this.

Martin explains this all took her years to discover which is surprising as it is no longer an arduous task and today it can be accomplished with a speedy search engine. It is an accessible venue where you can enter data quickly and have connections returned almost instantly.

And all of this is contingent upon Martin telling the truth about her being adopted and by whom. We have to take her word for that. She alleges the entire document is far too long for us mortals to fathom as it is 30 pages long. This should tell anyone familiar with ancestry that this is not a close relation; the longer the family tree/explanation... the more remote a connection.

If her document presented is truthful, then she herself has admitted she is not a blood relative because the Meeks married into the Kimball family. Someone who married into your family over one hundred years ago who shares what would be a 17th century ancestor with Natacha Rambova does not make you just a “fourth cousin”. Her neglecting to cite her actual connection in full, in my opinion reveals she is counting on people being too confused by all of this to challenge her claim.

And any discussion about her physically resembling Natacha Rambova is therefore irrelevant in light of her own document which clearly shows the Meeks family married into the Kimball family. Even if she was a fourth cousin the idea she would resemble Natacha is ludicrous.

The genealogist I consulted referred to this as “lineage aerobics” and I for one close the book on this subject and think it would be not only more worth my time but easier to decipher the Aztec Calendar Sun stone than Cindy Martin's miles of alleged connections to Natacha Rambova. Better the Aztec star glyphs, knots and tails of serpents... than cryptic listings which represent hundreds of years of what mathematically represents thousands of possible fourth cousins many times removed.

Even if every word on her document is true...this was a marriage connection and there is no shared DNA.

There are several well-executed ancestry lineages of Natacha Rambova online... with plenty of living relatives both Kimball and Shaughnessy... and to date, none named Cindy Martin. 

Moving on.

Monday, January 18, 2021

My Hero


Renato Floris - Matera

 

"Proof of Great Innocence"

 The following passage is excerpted from, The True Rudolph Valentino by Baltasar Cué. As a successful Spanish journalist working in Hollywood, he knew something about the veracity of press issued material; whether alleged to have been written by a movie star or commentary on them.

I share this passage because I am continually shocked by how some people today continue to believe the studio-generated versions of Valentino's history as truth. With little to no questioning they read much the same as readers of those fan magazines long ago.

It is not that Valentino was lying or being deceitful in allowing these aspects of his story to be fictionalized. He was a savvy celebrity whose every move and nuance was under scrutiny and there is no questioning he was a valuable property to be guarded; especially by himself. In the few years he graced the screen, he faced a heavy opposition poised to pounce on his slightest misstep. The studio press offices knew the situation well and acted accordingly.

This is what Baltasar Cué had to say about this:

“Anyone who is not familiar with the usual procedures in the Hollywood studios, will find it hard to believe that Valentino declared, even in an private chat, that his "autobiography" was not reliable. In reality, as a biographical document, no writing produced by the motion picture studios about the private lives of their artists can be considered reliable.

The mission of the aforementioned marketing offices - which form one of the main pillars of the huge film industry - is to ensure what the public thinks about the companies, the artists and the films, and that their thinking will push them favorably towards them.

It is therefore necessary to share with them, what will make them sympathetic to the popular feelings: virtue, intelligence, amenity, generosity, ingenuity, culture, etc.

The truth does not mix with such important commercial activity. Profit is the only goal. And just as it would be naive to believe that such medicine we see advertised in the newspapers has all the wonderful virtues attributed to it in the corresponding advertisements, so it is also proof of great innocence to believe as much when the press tells us about the cinematographic companies, its artists and its films.

In the United States, at least, the Hollywood marketing agencies send to the movie theatres not only the propaganda to be shown before the first exhibition, but also the reviews that the local press should publish after the premiere. What the readers of the newspaper of this or that town located thousands of kilometers away from Cinelandia imagine, do not know is that the reviews they read after having seen the film the previous night were written many months before by some employee of the film producer, and which have already been published in all the towns where the same film was shown.

In the same way, those wise opinions that are often published as if they had been expressed by movie stars were generated in many cases, by the brains of marketing agents. This is where the one usually finds the wit which the stars do not always possess. If one has little experience in Cinelandia, they must be very careful to praise a star for an opinion read in the press alleging to have been written by the star. In most cases, the opinion did not come from what was actually said.”


Friday, January 15, 2021

A Comment From Renato Floris

Congratulations Evelyn on defending youself and our work. We have never, ever thought of expanding our audience through the unknown Cindy Martin. I only know that she popped up like a mushroom just to throw me out, for no reason, from Dom Caruso's group and then reappeared with the nickname of Dark Mum to become the heavy artillery of Tracy Ryan Terhune and David Bret spreading hatred and defamation about us to the 4 winds, then she disappeared to reappear one day with this sentence:



"Fires of Victory"


I have mentioned before how one of the most fascinating aspects of studying Natacha Rambova was learning about the history of the Roerich family, their society, their art, their metaphysical involvements and various mahatmas. Although son Svetoslav was an accomplished and highly-acclaimed artist, I find father Nicholas' works more compelling. His epic scenes of the Altai region are epic. In his early days he was a renown set designer and I think this is apparent in his work. 

The politics of the Roerich Society today reveals a story of deep division internationally. I was in contact with both sides of the conflict while completing Beyond Valentino and had to tread lightly. It seems every country has its members and loyalty to one side or the other determines a great deal. 

For me it is the Roerich art which endures and the sweeping panoramas. 

Above: Nicholas Roerich's "Fires of Victory - Sentinel Lights on the Towers of Gobi", executed in 1940. 

Thursday, January 14, 2021

My Statement on “Who is Cindy Martin?”

Cindy Martin, under her alias Dark Mum, has quite the long career of bullying us on that designated hate blog Tracy Ryan Terhune hijacked and has run under my book Affairs Valentino's title for eight years.

On 4/23/2018, she writes how I am not so bright and that Affairs Valentino is, “the worst researched book”, (perhaps a play on Michael Morris writing that Affairs Valentino was the “best researched and best written book on Valentino”) Martin went on that day calling our work, “trash from Italy” and mocking our podcasts as,“hysterical and shrieking”.

On May 27, she files another hate filled rant in which she calls me a “user and a narcissist”; mentioning my deceased parents saying they never instilled any morals in me.

September 5... She writes a long post about my, “mental illness” and goes into detail how my husband Renato is shamelessly taking advantage of my mental decrepitude.

I could cite on and on from the archive of her spiteful diatribes, but to recap:

In the course of her bullying us nonsensically, she has bragged how she personally was “instrumental” in having our books removed from sale (an illegal thing to do as it is impeding our right to do business), told people she knew, “as fact” my defamation lawsuit v. David Bret (which I won) never existed. She spread the defamatory lie far and wide that I fraudulently used Michael Morris' name to put out his posthumous book, Beyond Valentino and that he did not write a word of it and she chimed in with Terhune and Bret on their daily bombardments of lies and insults, such as their claiming I forged documents and had a life of crime. All tremendously false and defamatory.

There are scarcely words to describe the extent of the pain and anguish which Cindy Martin inflicted and inflicts on us with her awful abuse which now has spanned years.

Consequently, I am sure any thinking person could understand how I find her cozy corner chit chat these days about her new Natacha Facebook group, terrifying in light of her documented past. How can someone write such torrents of heinous abuse targeting us with such a seething hatred and then pretend to also be a sweet old lady just launching her research, titter, titter. In explaining her history the following becomes key:

In May of 2019, Cindy Martin wrote Renato claiming she had been brainwashed/fooled/lied to and/or tricked by Tracy Terhune, David Bret and the other horrible people who run those two cult Facebook groups. She claimed they fed her the lies to say about me and indoctrinated her into hating me irrationally.

For a few days she engaged in a lengthy and revelatory exchange with Renato in which among other things she discussed how she could have all those cruel and false posts about me taken down from the deceitful blog Terhune runs under my book Affairs Valentino's title... and in this Cindy Martin toyed with the idea of suing Terhune but assured Renato we had the better lawsuit because of that blog. She went so far in her plans to sue Terhune to mention on June 2, her contacting the FBI, local cybercrime units and law enforcement.. and discussed the possibility of seeking a restraining order against Terhune.  

I excerpt but a few lines from this lengthy exchange under Fair Use guidelines to illustrate my point from her revelations. For example, she writes on May 20, 2019, how Tracy Terhune and Simon Constable, “are now thick as thieves along with Donna Hill, and they are working against Evelyn.” And adds,”Simon is the one for Evelyn to watch out for.” And, “I have a history with Simon. I know the snake he is. David Bret has been masquerading as Albert Morris for quite some time.”

Cindy Martin goes on to call Tracy Terhune,“truly a snake” and says he is a master at manipulation. She admits she knows David Bret, “lied” (about being served with the lawsuit) saying, “He was served those papers.” And she hits Donna Hill many times, saying she will try to “suck up to Terhune forever” and explains how,“Donna talks out of both sides of her mouth. Tracy has always been the puppet master. No one else has ever pulled the strings. Even David (Bret) would read his entire statement for his blog to him before posting it.”

Cindy Martin went on and on relating how she told Tracy Terhune a while ago that she, “refused to be his bully machine against....Evelyn” and refers to Simon Constable by saying,“Of all the people I've dealt with in the Valentino community, he is the slimiest. He is worse than David Bret..” In a longer message about Bret she wrote,“My point is that as there are many of us who detest David Bret, he has done so much damage to our gay and bisexual community.... even Tracy does not want Bret physically in the US.”

None of this information was new to us, but it was heavy to hear Cindy Martin spilling her guts. Now at some point those fiends she was dashing to the rocks, gave her the nod to come rushing back into the fold and she was off lickety split. Back again to insulting me to impress those running the “Campaign to Ruin Evelyn”, as she herself defined their actions. Perhaps they rationalized she was safer as an ally than an enemy.

Meanwhile Cindy Martin opens her own Facebook group, Rudolph Valentino Haven, or some such thing... and begins to take credit for my Rambova discoveries, i.e., telling a member of her group how she discovered the copy of the United Artists' contract. Actually, I did. And with this in mind she now crows how she is free to pursue her Rambova research. What research? Downloading my images and stealing my work? I know of many aspects of Rambova's life which deserve further research... maybe she could ask me about that. Instead, she is bragging how she is off to Salt Lake to cozy up with her 53rd cousin, 85 times removed to I guess compare noses.

To me her shady and latest claim to being a family member has no bearing on her past behavior. If she was Rambova's only sister.. it would make no difference. Her past is documented as well as her terrible words and this is who she is ultimately. I, for one, await a real screenshot of that ancestry.com document she posted so victoriously, one with a proper URL header. I could have made those “word salads” in Photoshop in ten minutes. It is not a legal document. Furthermore, it lends no credibility at all to me because her past of malevolent bullying is her actual identity and her every cruel word hurled our way renders her lavish, self-congratulatory preening over being the 105th cousin of Rambova absolutely nauseating; well actually stomach-churning.

Because her name-calling and vile abuse still rings loud and clear here. So I say that what she refers to as our, “trash from Italy”... all those books, videos and podcasts are doing quite well, thank-you. And for her information my parents instilled the highest of moral standards in me and it is for this reason I call her out. I could do nothing less. My parents taught me well how to stand up for myself, my loved ones and for truth and justice.

In all my seventy-two years, I have never known of a more duplicitous and hateable person. As we survive the hellscape of her years of frightening attacks and her defamatory, ruinous lies intended to wound and impede our right to do business...And with her recent opening of the Facebook group, Natacha's Niche...the skies of Rambova's legacy darken with this malevolent presence of Dark Mum! I assert my authority as the legal custodian of Michael Morris' highly-respected Natacha Rambova archive and as the co-author of his posthumous book Beyond Valentino to issue my official statement:

I deplore and denounce the very presence of Cindy Martin in Rambova's legacy.

Thank-you!

Thank-you to a generous friend for sharing this dynamic image. Here, Rambova in her role in "Creoles" which I address in Astral Affairs Rambova. The book is now an audio book on our Youtube Channel @  https://www.youtube.com/TheAffairsValentino


 

Wednesday, January 13, 2021

Why Do Eleanor Gribbin & Simon Constable Contest the Villalobos Dissertation & Valentino's Own Letters?

It is absolutely astounding to read the ignorant vaporings of Eleanor Gribbin and Simon Constable as they cling desperately to their idiotic premises. What do they have against the Valentino family and Jeanine Villalobos' Phd dissertation anyway? They now accuse even Valentino of lying in his personal letters to his family in which he discusses cures and medications for syphilis. And he admits he contracted this from prostitutes.

Does Gribbin think her own rumor mongering, passed off as fact...and feigned expertise somehow is more authoritative than the word of Valentino himself and his great grand niece, Jeanine Villalobos who cited family letters?

The evidence is air tight and not “negative rumors” as Gribbin tells a member of her group...and the idea that it was gonorrhea and not syphilis is absurdity. One, because if this was the case why would Valentino be writing his own family about cures and medications for syphilis? And two... why is one any different than the other? For me this is an absurd and meaningless differentiation.

The desperate machinations of the cult in this regard speak volumes as to their fear of legitimate research and the truth. This is precisely why we are banned from their groups and why they have mercilessly attacked us and all our 14 books for a decade. And it is one of the defining aspects of a cult to be suppressing literature, which now includes the Phd dissertation of Villalobos and the hand written letters of Rudolph Valentino.

Eleanor Gribbin knows very little in my opinion on the subject and I base this on her steadfast refusal to learn something new. She told someone on her group that Affairs Valentino was the rantings of a “madwoman”... this a book with the stories of Ullman, Mennillo, the settlement of the estate based on the court documents, etc...and for me she has never risen a smidgeon above willful ignorance on the subject. She denies court records on file, letters written by Valentino, etc. and cites as fact the innuendo-ridden meanderings of Simon Constable and second and third hand hearsay...as being more authoritative than the written words of Rudolph Valentino himself.

I am happy to see that the podcast setting this down as fact is doing extremely well and today reached 290 listens. And again I ask why are Eleanor Gribbin and Simon Constable calling the Villalobos dissertation fraudulent? Why do they think they have a square inch of ground left to stand on... on this subject? They don't. 

It is fact Rudolph Valentino suffered from syphilis. He himself wrote about new cures and medications he was taking. Surely he knew what he had. Maybe he should have asked Eleanor and Simon though... because they claim to know more about it than he did or his descendant who had his actual letters in hand.

I think the majority of people see clean through their cult voices any more. Their day of hegemony is over.

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Would Be Nice


 

Born That Way

I based our most recent podcast, “Rudolph Valentino, That Left Eye and More”, on the evidence presented by Ms. Jeanine Villalobos in her Phd dissertation and the research executed by Professor Aurelio Miccoli. I am not surprised to see reports from the two “Valentino was gay/bisexual cult” Facebook groups..of the usual and insidious demeaning of their work, grumblings about the podcast and citing the discoveries without accreditation. But I have to say I am blown away how the very subject of Rudolph Valentino's suffering from syphilis which he contracted from prostitutes and the ramifications of this ..is new information to so many people. Villalobos' dissertation has been out for almost a decade. Why was, and still is... this information so suppressed? This is important information; the illness he suffered from for fifteen years...which impacted so many aspects of his life and which could have contributed to his early death.

I am told that on “Mad About the Boy”, the very subject is shut down by administrator Eleanor Gribbin with a mocking of anyone who might believe such a thing. I remind her Valentino himself wrote about this illness in detail in letters which still exist today; letters Villalobos cited in her dissertation. Is Gribbin accusing Villalobos of faking those letters and more absurdly accusing Valentino of lying in the letters? This is outrageous and censorship.

I am told that on the other cult Facebook group, “We Never Forget”... the subject Villalobos brought forth was discussed minimally. Today I present my theory as to why this suppression of her work is law on those two cult groups.

It is because those letters to Bruno stand as definitive evidence Valentino was “Born That Way” and sexually attracted to women.

Of course I will come under more attack for daring to say the obvious but what else is new...No, I have never had a reason nor interest in proving I was right or wrong or in proving Valentino gay or not gay. Long ago, I set out to find an answer through documentation...to the prevalent question, "Was Valentino gay?'...and I discovered a hoax; a tremendous lie... but in my exposing this hoax I have been assaulted for over ten years of my life by being called “homophobic”. Here is a news flash for the “Valentino was gay/bisexual cult leaders”... it is not homophobic to say someone is not gay. Someone's truth is just that. And writing endless lies and fabrications will not change the facts.

Valentino was attracted to women, had sex with prostitutes who were women and paid a price and then wrote about it. How much more proof does there need to be? This subject is closed and has been by Valentino himself.

In writing this, the lyrics, “Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose”, come to my mind... because I guess by now I am free because I have been called “homophobic” a million times by the “Valentino was gay/bisexual cult leaders”. So one more time probably will not kill me. But this does not change my reality one bit. I am not homophobic. 

I believe people are “Born that Way” as Lady Gaga sings, “There's nothing wrong with loving who you are...”. And a person's truth is a sacred truth and not open to “opinion”. It is tragic our culture is still so shockingly unaccepting and judgmental about homosexuality but even in my lifetime this has changed considerably and for the better. I have hope.

In this I expose the homophobic cult leaders as they wield the word, “homophobia” as their personal and frivolous weapon of choice to destroy critics. I expose their homophobia for attacking people calling them homophobic slurs... “fat lezzies”, “a man who wears a dress”, “fat lezzie who can't get a man”, “Padre Liberace” and worse. That is homophobia at its worst. And outing celebrities as gay just to sell bad books, based on innuendo is also the worst kind of homophobia; portraying homosexuality as titillating perpetuates antiquated and dangerous stereotypes. And in my opinion those two Facebook groups should be shut down for their obscene homophobia in this regard.

Valentino's letters to Bruno Pozzan are honest and key in the realization of actual evidence as to how he was born. They are not fantasy, trumped up innuendo and ridiculous lies about source materials never presented. These are written in Valentino's own handwriting and were brought forth by his family...letters in which he is admitting he had sex with women..with the “signorine”, the prostitutes... going with one woman and then the other. He writes, according to Villalobos, telling Bruno he was home sick from something he caught from the prostitutes, who were women. I think the subject is closed.

I have written about the censorship on those two groups many times. But isn't it obvious to anyone on those groups that we are blocked, banned from even participating in the conversations which are often about our work? Why are we banned? I believe it is because we refuse to bow before the altar of their homophobic ridden “Valentino was gay or bisexual” hoax. I have searched for decades for a shred of evidence to prove otherwise. None was found. Valentino's heterosexuality was remarkably unambiguous.

I have been hearing from people for years who have been banned from those groups for contesting the Valentino was gay/bisexual tenet. And in almost every case the person banned was called homophobic. That has been their effective strategy which sadly continues. I have been accused of being “obsessed” but what colossal projection is that?... when their rhetoric and their books, and I use that term loosely, are being churned out about “Valentino's Men” and are based on nothing but salacious homophobic lies and innuendo. Their own actions stand as living proof that they are the ones obsessed...as they censor away and enforce their fundamentalist doctrines on those two Facebook groups. Enough already. Everyone deserves their own truth be told and not have this aspect of their history contorted into fiction. Even Valentino.

The letters to Bruno put an end to this subject and I am happy the letter they tried to heave in the trash bin of Valentino history found us as it did. Incredibly, as I discuss in the podcast. In my opinion the “offing” of this precious letter stands as proof of the censorship on those groups and I hope the message reaches people that this takes place. Because God knows we are banned from saying a word there. When Renato requested to join “Mad About the Boy”, Simon Constable told him rudely to “Go Away” and threatened to report him to Facebook. For what? For asking to join in the discussions? Facts are facts and as Villalobos and Valentino himself presented it many years ago... it is not an “opinion”... it is fact...Valentino was having sex with women. Mystery solved.

The translation of Valentino's letter to Bruno which was rescued from the trash bin of Valentino history... and images of the actual letter are included in our book, Rudolph Valentino In English by Jeanne De Recqueville. Which is available here:

http://bit.ly/RVbyJDR

**And I add in closing that in my opinion the entire, "Valentino could have been bisexual" is an option for people to say to guarantee they won't be called homophobic, attacked and mercilessly so. 

Said podcast can be heard here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QBbiUFWaoI



Monday, January 11, 2021

Cole's

Me (below) in front of Cole's on 6th street in Los Angeles. Their website says they are open for dining-in which is surprising all things considered. I used to post more pictures of myself traveling way back when. But one day I had lunch with family in a restaurant which was down the street, next door?... maybe in the same building?... as Tracy Terhune's home. This I did not know, had no clue. 

But since I posted that picture of myself, he has claimed I was stalking him that day. Ridiculous. Another magnificent lie. I am not a stalker and actually have lived in hiding from all of them for a long time. 

Had I known I was in any proximity to Tracy Terhune, I would have left immediately. Frightening to think about actually. This was taken a while back after a lunch at Cole's... and I have no idea if any of "them" live near this establishment, but I am sure if they do I will hear about it. 


Sunday, January 10, 2021

In the Land of the Hot Canyons

Over the years I have written a lot. Whether it was to process the attacks on me and mine or whether it was in response and as a defense against the all the lies.

I found the following page in my fat files and it was written in 2015 and is somewhat self-explanatory. I titled it, “In The Land of the Hot Canyons”. 


(below) sightseeing in St. George, Utah and a rare sighting of Hala Pickford and yours truly. This photo op was too rich to pass up. 



Saturday, January 9, 2021

How I Feel About This

So the Valentino cult now organizes their full-on assault on Natacha Rambova, spearheaded by "Cindy Martin", the woman who bragged openly she was “instrumental” in having our books removed from sale and who maliciously lied to prospective readers of Michael Morris's posthumous book, Beyond Valentino...a book he was working on when he suddenly died. When asked about the new book by Michael Morris... Martin told the interested person that there was no new book written by Michael Morris. Beyond Valentino, she lied, was fraudulently written by me.

The Valentino cult knows only to tear down with gross fabrications, innuendo and insults and continue their undermining and “ruination campaigns” and all to be free IMO to destroy any truth about Valentino and Rambova. As “Cindy Martin”has a history of taking full claim and credit for my research and discoveries and being consistently more than horrible towards me, Renato and our work... I personally think she is the wrong person to “go to” about anything Rambova or Valentino and can state that most all of what she says about me is a straight up lie.

For the truth is I met and worked with so many memorable and interesting people while I spent that year finishing Michael Morris' posthumous book, Beyond Valentino: the artist in Madrid who restored the image for the cover, the Egyptologists from Yale who wrote an essay about Natacha's Egyptological life's work, and William James, historian on Mallorca who worked so long and earnestly on his essay on Natacha and the Spanish Civil War.

Let's just say this...I am very protective of Michael Morris' archive and his last work... and in this I assume my position as enforcer of his copyrights and legacy. I champion the cause here with all that this entails. And today it entails letting people know how I feel about this.

Michael envisioned Beyond Valentino as a smaller volume and when he died we were struggling to decide which images to include or not. After his death, I decided I would include them all, the book would be a monument to Michael and as his “final word on Rambova” everything had to be included... there would be no revisiting this for Michael.

And I felt strongly that the book, in light of its spiritual significance... be iconic on its own. I really feel it is and am happy about that.