By
definition bullying is:
Bullying is the use of force, coercion, or threat, to abuse, aggressively dominate or intimidate. Bullying is a subcategory of aggressive behavior characterized by the following three minimum criteria: (1) hostile intent, (2) imbalance of power, and (3) repetition over a period of time. Bullying is the activity of repeated, aggressive behavior intended to hurt another individual, physically, mentally, or emotionally.
Bullying is the use of force, coercion, or threat, to abuse, aggressively dominate or intimidate. Bullying is a subcategory of aggressive behavior characterized by the following three minimum criteria: (1) hostile intent, (2) imbalance of power, and (3) repetition over a period of time. Bullying is the activity of repeated, aggressive behavior intended to hurt another individual, physically, mentally, or emotionally.
This
is an exact description of what they have done and continue to do to
us.
I
address point by point Tracy Ryan Terhune's contrived attempt to
accuse us of bullyism.
1-
Evelyn was invited by the University of Turin to lecture about
Rudolph Valentino's sexuality. She shared her discoveries which were
largely a consequence of careful research of the literature dedicated
to the sexuality of the star.
A
brief part of the conference was dedicated to this careful critical
analysis of some of the most popular texts on Valentino's alleged
homosexuality. The audience was not at all surprised by this as this
was precisely the theme of her lecture, "Valentino's sexuality"
and nothing else. Among other things, this was a topic requested by
and approved by the University of Turin.
Evelyn
did not expose her own points of view at all but the results of a
careful research free from any prejudice. She was certainly not there
attacking other authors and was participating in a conference with
her respected "colleagues" in a serious manner giving a
presentation before other authors of works on Valentino.
Tracy
Terhune's accusation is enormous nonsense because there is no
corporate rule that prevents authors from criticizing, with clear
evidence, the works of "colleagues". She did criticize the text of some,“colleagues”, who
with their behavior manifest superficiality and write without precise
references or sources and with no intellectual honesty.
Among
other things, Michael Morris was well aware of Evelyn's research on
this subject as he was a member of the scientific committee of the
conference. Tracy Ryan Terhune, who has dedicated a blog for many
years with the sole intent to demolish Evelyn's work, is preaching
about courtesies between authors and proper criticisms? Come on! How
extremely hypocritical of him and he should be ashamed of just saying
it. At most, he can preach about his rudeness to other authors and
play Truffle but better he keep silent.
Evelyn
never attacked David Bret in her speech but critiqued his work with
literary evidence and asked for his sources which he did not have and
does not have. In addition, Evelyn has never reiterated criticisms
of Bret's work because over the years she has only been defending
herself from Bret's treacherous and defamatory attacks. Because for
her, her work ended there in that conference room and all because
Bret's infantile, wounded ego has kept a truly hyper-stressing
situation alive.
Evelyn
did not put the conference online, the University uploaded all the
conference speeches and the conference videos are property of the
University of Turin.
2
- Evelyn has never published ridiculous David Bret images; do not
confuse actions done by other people. For years he and Tracy Terhune
tried to merge Evelyn with someone else and blame her for actions
done by them.
3
- Perhaps Terhune and Bret have never had cats and do not know that
cats, in doing their needs, are very reserved and no cat has urinated
or defecated on a book or Bret's book. At the time Evelyn posted that
image in jest she was trying to cope with Bret writing everyday how
she was having sex with her father's corpse and he and Terhune were
spreading lies everywhere online that she had a drug history and did
cocaine. They fail to even mention what they were doing to inspire
some response from her. She was trying to deal with this highly
stressed situation.
4
- The videos put online by Evelyn and I were a fierce defense against
Bret's defamatory actions and those of his cronies, nothing more.
"The Team" is certainly not Evelyn's invention as that is
the signature of years of highly offensive and defamatory attacks in
another blog which they all linked to. Anyone can request the link
to our defense videos, of which neither I nor Evelyn are ashamed.
They are her brave defense. And she did not like making those videos
or want to make them.
5
- Regarding the crypt ceremony it is not possible to make even the
slightest nice criticism because although Tracy Ryan Terhune can
criticize all others tremendously and brag about that...on that
subject his victims, must devotedly keep silent.
6-
Regarding the mythical and for Terhune a very threatening lunch we
had in 2014...in North Hollywood; we were guests of our relatives
who at the time lived in Van Nuys. We did not even remotely imagine
that we could be eating so close to Tracy Ryan Terhune. If we had
known we would have certainly avoided any possible unpleasant
crossings and we would have kindly declined the invitation. Evelyn
posted many pictures of herself on her blog during our trip that year
from the Los Angeles Hall of Records to some taken in Amsterdam.
7-
Evelyn has opened several blogs, but only and always to defend
herself from Bret's low attacks and sinister company. And, I repeat,
the much desecrated Forewarning was nothing more than a report of
facts that really happened and statements that were actually heard.
8
- Regarding the person who said she was bullied by Evelyn because she
was vegan sometime in 2011; this is ridiculous. Evelyn would never,
never do this after having been a vegetarian and vegan herself for
many years. She would have never dreamed of making fun of anyone
because she was vegan. And regarding the blog "Boycott David
Bret", Evelyn has never participated in that blog and has never
approved it. Evelyn and I have great respect for other people's
choices in life.
9
- We have never, ever bullied Cindy Martin. This is a shameful lie
and indeed we can only thank her for having revealed, for a certain
period, the maneuvers of a pact of bullies created only with the
intention to harm us.
10
- Regarding our online presence trying to have some truth known, I
repeat we would like to be able to use our time in more rewarding
activities than having to defend ourselves endlessly against unjust attacks
which are always full of malice.
The evidence of their bullying us is not a few perceived insults from a decade ago... it is a daily
aggressive action and has been for 10 years. They hang on to
perceived insults which happened a decade ago which are grossly
exaggerated and false. When their disgusting actions have been captured in
thousands of screen shots with many of these now being public record from the
defamation lawsuit Evelyn filed and won against David Bret.
I
conclude by reiterating that attacking a person's honest research and
resulting book with lies and on a blog having the title of that
person's book and then boasting of being the first on the list of
searches on google for that book... this is not only absolutely wrong
but it is pure and simple CYBER BULLYING!
We state again, we do not bully anyone and never have.
We state again, we do not bully anyone and never have.
If
David Bret and Tracy Ryan Terhune want to be the bully police and
find some real bullies, they don't have to go far, just look in the
closest mirror!
According
to all the evidence and every definition, they are shameful bullies!