Today, June 13, 2020, I discovered the
comment left to me by one Dallas Martin on this blog some time ago. I address his
attempt to wound me and shock me and respond to his accusations.
I hope this serves to clarify his obvious confusion over the entire
issue.
I feel it is worth sharing some history
here regarding his mother Ms. Cindy Martin for his enlightenment.
Before I go any further I will clarify one point. Mr. D. Martin
accuses me, in a most denigrating way, of being “obsessed with
Valentino”. Well I am obsessed... but not with Valentino but with
the truth; the truth about the research I uncovered. Such was the
reaction to this research that a little band of obviously obsessed
people... which included his mother... attacked me and the book
mercilessly. This because they were frantic to cover up for some
stolen records and protecting the decades of lying by the Valentino
family.
In this regard, I considered them all
shills for the family truthfully.
I reiterate I did request to interview
the Valentino family for Affairs Valentino and they refused my
request. I was very disappointed about that... but so great was their
fury that I managed to find George Ullman's children and his memoir
written in 1975, (which they had in their possession for decades and
said absolutely nothing about publicly) that I guess instead of
meeting with me they set out to kill the messenger via their mongrel
surrogates.
So no, Mr. D. Martin, I have never been
nor currently am obsessed with Valentino. I wrote my book and
honestly would have moved on had it not been immediately required of
me to defend myself day and night; so great was the tremendous
onslaught of vicious and very sick attacks.
Mr. Martin accuses me of blackmailing
his mother. I am not sure how that works in this case because we
never asked her for a thing. She volunteered to write a letter to the
British court about David Bret on our behalf. We have never said...
“do this or else” to her and she volunteered everything she
shared with us. Nor did she ever tell us not to use what she wrote to
us to support our case. She gave us all of this to support us and did
so voluntarily. No one forced her to do a thing.
And Mr. Martin seems offended we doubt
his existence. I can only relate this to my own situation. If someone
doubted my existence I might be amused... but I would certainly have
no reason to respond with fury and I have many ways to prove my
existence to someone concerned over that. Mr. Martin proves nothing
to date.
So the history of Ms. Cindy Martin in
regards to us is basically this.
Some time around 2013 a gentleman named
Dom Caruso was running a sizable Valentino Facebook group. Renato
joined upon his request and they were friendly and exchanged many a
message.
Dom Caruso had a phrase, “The Unholy
Four”. This was his phrase, he coined it and he told us he was
referring to Donna Hill, Tracy Terhune, David Bret and Jeanine
Villalobos. At one point Dom began to refer to the “Unholy Three”.
I asked him which one of the unholy team he had eliminated and he
never replied. He vanished but not before he deleted Renato from his
group with no explanation.
I knew he previously deleted Donna Hill
from the group and had almost zero respect for Tracy Terhune and
David Bret so we assumed he meant Villalobos; especially as Renato
was deleted from the group when previously he was welcome.
It was some time later, maybe even a
year later when a Cindy Martin appeared to be the main administrator
of the page. We had no idea who she was, had never seen her on any
Facebook groups, but she came on board to run Dom Caruso's group with
a tremendous and immediate authority.
It was apparent she was working with
the other Unholy trio in trying to impede our right to do business
and desecrate us and our work.
By the time I finished Michael Morris'
book Beyond Valentino, she was in full force attack mode and
telling people I never knew Michael Morris, that I took advantage of
his family after his death and that he did not write the book. She
trashed the launch of Michael Morris' last work.
She also bragged how she was
instrumental in having our books removed from sale, accused me of
forging the court records, told many people our lawsuit against David
Bret never existed and contributed in great measure to the defamation
on that hate blog Terhune and Bret run under my book's title.
When Ms. Cindy Martin wrote Renato some
time ago and to our surprise confessed to a great deal and revealed
much to us about the campaign to ruin us by Terhune and Bret... we
were extremely grateful and still are. We never cut any deals,
bargained with her or pressured her into anything.
Mr. D. Martin can not change who we
are. His denigrating remarks are just that. No matter how bungled up
in his fury he is, it changes nothing about us or our actions. We
defend ourselves against senseless attacks and always will.
The comment he left for me on this blog
speaks much more about one Dallas Martin than it does about us.
Defending your mother is admirable, but not when it involves debasing
people she has aggressively and very publicly attacked. It is not admirable when it involves lashing out at two people who have been forced to endure one of the
most heinous and long lasting cyberbullying assaults... of which his
mother participated.
To him I say. I have been under
constant attack by these people since 2003, and point out that he is
defending people who sit on stolen court documents and who have lied
for decades to cover up a miscarriage of justice and a completely
false version of Rudolph Valentino's history.
This is about history and not obsession
young man. Know the difference. I wrote history based on a great deal
of exciting new discovery and if they, Dom Caruso's “Unholy Trio”,
had left Affairs Valentino alone long ago... it might have come and gone
relatively unnoticed. Their unending burning of our books has only
drawn attention to the blaze they create.
I will not post the comment left for me
on this blog by Dallas Martin because it was extremely rude,
offensive and cruel. Perhaps his mother could be a bit more
forthcoming about her moments of clarity when she opened up and did
the right thing to stop a terrible act being perpetuated against us.
It was heroic of her and I only wished she had stayed the course and
assumed the role of hero in this horrible saga. She certainly had the
power and could have seized the moment.
