In
a recent post on the blog Tracy Ryan Terhune runs (and has run for
eight years) under my book's title, Affairs Valentino, where
he maliciously deceives web traffic seeking legitimate information
about my work to find a hateful platform where David Bret violates a
court order prohibiting him from writing about us...on this blog,
Terhune now cites my “Dirty Deeds” in his millionth attempt to
vilify me and portray himself as a victim. I ask today... indeed just
who has committed the “Dirty Deeds”? I think the evidence speaks
for itself.
Tracy
Ryan Terhune cites a few random decade's old inanities... such as his
saying I sent him a “deceiving letter” long ago in which I asked
for his input on his then issues with a silent film blogger Hala
Pickford. I'd already sent a letter to Ms. Pickford and she replied
by asking if we could meet and discuss it in person. We did. I then
sent a letter as inquiry to Tracy Ryan Terhune.
I
will say in reading Terhune's letter to me about Ms. Pickford, I was
not so surprised at his aggressive rhetoric and his admission he had
been monitoring her, (a young woman in her 20's) for two years.
My
sending him that letter was not a “dirty deed”. And I did
consider the conflict between Pickford and Terhune to be, “Affairs
Valentino” and for a while I sought to document it. How many other
silent film stars inspire such interest and activity? I was not as
involved with Ms. Pickford then as Terhune claims and went to the
court hearing hoping to record it as it was not a closed hearing.
I
read the posts by Pickford and Terhune and my personal reaction to
his reaction at being called “King of Valentino” by Ms. Pickford
or “King Kookie” was one of disbelief. I am not delving into the
merits of that sad case but will say that in the least she had some
humor in her posts while he sure did not.
His
outrage at this is all the more absurd now after his ensuing decade
and more of his name-calling me and my husband Renato; such as bitch,
Fool Zumaya, idiots, Child Star 72, calling our books trash, not
worth a dime, writing posts mentioning my beloved and deceased
parents, and linking to the unthinkable levels of bullying by David
Bret and proudly doing so. Terhune has posted headlines saying there
were warrants out for my arrest and linked to posts claiming I was a
drug addict and worse. All terribly cruel and false. I would ask who
does he think he is fooling by trying to claim I am the one guilty of
dirty deeds? I can answer that and say he fooled and fools no one.
He
carries on in his current post with his whining over my acts of more
than a decade ago by saying I delivered a paper to the court about
some fake sickness. Yes, I did Ms. Pickford a favor by delivering an
envelope to court explaining she was sick in bed. Truthfully, I was
annoyed to have to take time to do this. I did so because I am a kind
person and because she was sick, having been in the the Providence
Saint Joseph Medical Center in Burbank the previous night. She was
very ill and I will attest to that. Dirty Deed or favor for a sick
person ten years ago?
And
I did not sign any paper of Proof of Service to him. As I explained
in a previous post on this blog, I retrieved that document in 2014
and my signature was forged.
I
add here that throughout Terhune's legal involvement with Ms.
Pickford he never ceased to claim she “self-published” my book
Affairs Valentino and he
never ceased to interject the book into his court case; not
one case but two. He has claimed for years on end that I interjected
my book into his legal cases because I covered a court hearing. It is
my opinion he pursued this strategy in an effort to stop the
publication of my book. This because Ms. Pickford published the first
edition of Affairs Valentino and I fired her shortly after.
According to Tracy Ryan Terhune's logic about this, every reporter
covering and writing about a legal case is “interjecting”
themselves into the case. It was he who worked hard to interject the
name of Affairs Valentino into his legal cases despite Ms.
Pickford having no authority over the book.
He
was convinced she still had some authority as was evident on the
day he chased Ms. Pickford through a court house into a parking lot
while yelling, “You're going to jail!”..and where her father
confronted him saying, “What will it take for you to stop harassing
my daughter?” To which Tracy Ryan Terhune replies, “She has to
guarantee that Affairs Valentino never happens again”. She
never held any rights over my book and certainly did not at that
time.
Throughout
this time, Terhune affiliated openly online with David Bret by
linking to his sites... at one time Bret was running some five or six
targeting me. Terhune also linked to another heinous blog and a post
which in my opinion he sure wrote because of the line, “Angels
Wept”. As Terhune ran another blog titled, “Valentino Wept” and
used this tag line after the shortest verse in the bible, “Jesus
Wept”... it is not a stretch of the imagination to believe he wrote
this vicious and utterly invasive piece of cyber-bullying about me
and left his signature in the form of those two words.
I
cite as posted on August 25, 2012, “After more
than 8 decades of selfless service to their communities, God fearing
respect to their family and investing everything they could to raise
a God-fearing and honest daughter, I can imagine that they look down
in sorrow and sadness, wondering where they went wrong. George and
Elizabeth are surely rolling in their graves at the conniving monster
you have become. If angels ever wept, Evelyn...”
These
are all dirty deeds; grievous bullying by definition and horrifying
levels of stalking and trolling. And this represents but a few lines
from the years of posts by Terhune which are almost all linked within
their network of “ruin”.
In
2014, when I retrieved the court records of his case against Ms.
Pickford in Burbank, I found the following documents which he
submitted to the court. These stand incredibly as proof he was being
deceptive and aiding David Bret by contributing to those daily
killing machine blogs. I share these as images #1,2, and 3.
In his Facebook message to Bret #1, Terhune instructs him how to hide the
fact he was the one feeding the information to him for use in his
bullying. I add that Bret obeyed his orders and his following day post thanks his inside contact at the Burbank Court House.
#1
#2-3
As Terhune says he “laughs out loud” while reading Bret's blogs, I ask
how he can claim in his sworn statement to the court, #2 and #3.. that he never
heard of Bret before the contact? Illogical. I also recall Terhune
writing a review of Bret's Valentino book when it came out. So his
dirty deeds were all in all not so well-disguised.
I
have never run a blog for eight years and counting under his book's
title where I deceive people by pretending it is a literary critique
when it is in reality a platform for hate and lies.
I
have never run a campaign to ruin him by recruiting people... such as
known felons with mile long criminal records. I have never trolled nor used his parent's first names and implied I knew them personally.
How sick is that?
As
we now know from Ms. Cindy Martin's messages which I have cited,
Terhune has done all of this and no doubt much more.... behind the
scenes.
Today
I posted the link to the Google drive of all of the David Bret
screenshots we submitted as evidence to the lawsuit and these public
record documents can be seen at www.zumayawinslawsuit.com
.
Me...
doing a favor for someone who was sick? Me... having my signature
forged? Me... writing a letter to him asking him some questions?
These are part of the history of this sordid story but not dirty
deeds. These are events which took place a decade ago and he is
feebly still whining about it... I cite and respond to his fresh
dirty deeds from just this past week. Who is he fooling? No one.
Despite
my years of writing my defense as I do today, of filling those
folders he displays which are so full of my efforts to undo the
damage he and Bret so gleefully inflict on me and mine.. and despite
his position now, according to the substantiation by Ms. Martin, of
achieving some status as overlord and censor wielding his control of
the major Valentino Facebook groups... Despite all this...In my
opinion he is not the King of Valentino.
*the three images in this post are public record.
